Floor materials compared
Cleanroom floors are chosen by performance, not by material name. The surface must be smooth, impervious and able to withstand repeated cleaning and disinfection without damage, and the material must shed few particles.
Whichever material is chosen, seams, coving, penetrations and repairs are assessed with it. Conductive, static-dissipative and merely anti-static are not the same performance, and ordinary epoxy or ordinary PVC is never assumed to be a conductive floor.
The matrix below summarises general engineering considerations when selecting floor materials. No regulation prescribes a particular material, and a manufacturer's suitability statement does not certify the finished room or process.
Floor material review matrix
- Candidate
- Conditional
- Not suitable
- Not established
- Gray text = conditions and cautions

Ordinary epoxy
Continuous finish · covingIllustrative material samplePharmaceutical GMP
CandidateContinuous finish with coving up the wall.
Confirm compatibility with the actual disinfectants and thermal loads per product
Semiconductor and electronics
Not suitableNot suitable where the process needs an electrostatic-control floor.
Assess particle and molecular emissions separately
Food HACCP
ConditionalApply after checking sanitation chemicals, wet slip risk, drainage and thermal shock

Conductive or static-dissipative epoxy
Processes with an electrostatic risk · ESD-controlled areasIllustrative material samplePharmaceutical GMP
ConditionalOnly where an electrostatic risk justifies it; not mandatory for every GMP room
Semiconductor and electronics
CandidateCandidate for ESD-controlled areas.
Test electrical and cleanliness performance separately against the approved specification
Food HACCP
ConditionalOnly where an identified electrostatic risk exists.
Conductivity does not replace hygiene performance

Welded PVC sheet
Welded seams · covingIllustrative material samplePharmaceutical GMP
CandidateWelded seams and coving are available.
Check seam condition, service loads and disinfectant compatibility
Semiconductor and electronics
CandidateConductive or dissipative sheet variants are candidates.
Ordinary sheet is not an ESD substitute
Food HACCP
ConditionalAssess wet-service seams, chemicals and thermal loading.
No universal suitability is assumed

Resinous terrazzo
Circulation and high-traffic areasIllustrative material samplePharmaceutical GMP
ConditionalConsider for circulation and high-traffic areas.
Not a default floor for critical aseptic rooms
Semiconductor and electronics
Not establishedNo general cleanroom or ESD suitability has been established
Food HACCP
ConditionalAssess wet slip risk and cleanability.
No blanket recommendation
- Drainage: a food-plant drainage detail is never transferred into a sterile pharmaceutical area as is. EU GMP Annex 1 (2022) Section 4.9 keeps sinks and drains out of Grade A and B.
- Food: impervious, non-toxic, cleanable floors with appropriate drainage follow Codex General Principles of Food Hygiene Section 9.1.3. The Korean HACCP evaluation criteria are the Standards for the Certification of Food and Livestock Product Safety Management (MFDS notice); their detailed items are confirmed separately.
Sources
- EU GMP Annex 1 (Manufacture of Sterile Medicinal Products, 2022) Sections 4.5–4.9 — surface and material performance, no drains in Grade A/B
- MFDS Regulation on Pharmaceutical Manufacturing and Quality Control (Notice No. 2024-87), Annex 1 (Sterile medicinal products)
- Codex Alimentarius, General Principles of Food Hygiene, CXC 1-1969 (rev. 2022), Section 9.1.3 — floors and drainage
- MFDS Standards for the Certification of Food and Livestock Product Safety Management (notice)
- ISO 14644-3:2019 Section 4.2.9 — electrostatic tests (conductive-floor resistance limits follow the adopted specification)


